Health Facilities

AB 92 (Gallagher, R-Chico)

Follow

Failed to pass the Assembly Health Committee by the deadline and is now a two-year bill.

AB 92 would require health facilities to allow visits from specified family members unless they pose health or safety risks or disrupt operations, or if the patient objects. In end-of-life situations, in-person visitation cannot be prohibited unless the patient refuses, but visitors would be required to adhere to the same personal protective equipment and testing protocols as staff. Facilities would be allowed to impose reasonable restrictions on visitation — such as limits on hours, age, and number of visitors — but would be required to develop alternate protocols to maximize visitation during health or safety concerns. This bill is similar to AB 2549 (Gallagher, 2024), for which CHA was successful in negotiating amendments to address concerns. AB 2549 was vetoed by the governor. 

AB 421 (Solache, D-Lakewood)

Follow

Introduced on Feb. 5. April 8 hearing in the Assembly Public Safety Committee canceled at the author's request. To be heard in the Assembly Judiciary Committee.

AB 421 would prohibit California law enforcement agencies from sharing any information with immigration authorities about enforcement actions occurring within one mile of childcare facilities, religious institutions, or hospitals and medical offices.

AB 435 (Wilson, D-Suisun City)

Support

Passed the Assembly Appropriations Committee on May 7. Pending an Assembly floor vote.

AB 435 would increase the age requirements for several safety belt and child passenger restraint system laws. The bill includes a hospital provision that would increase the age requirement, commencing Jan. 1, 2027, from eight to 10 years old for hospitals to provide parents or guardians with information about child car seat and seatbelt laws at the time of a child’s discharge.

Assembly Transportation Support Letter

AB 849 (Soria, D-Merced)

Oppose Unless Amended

Passed the Assembly Health Committee on April 29. May 21 hearing in the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

AB 849 would, by Jan. 1, 2027, require providers as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 127500.2 to notify patients, in writing or electronically, that for sensitive examinations involving an ultrasound performed by a sonographer, a trained medical chaperone will be available upon request. Patients would have the right to decline a chaperone, and a provider would have the right to decline performing a sensitive exam without a medical chaperone present. Facilities would be required to educate sonographers and staff who may serve as medical chaperones about appropriate observational and intervention techniques, how to properly drape a patient, the importance of neutrality, and how to report any inappropriate behaviors observed or communicated by the patient. CHA is working closely with Assemblymember Esmeralda Soria’s office to further address staffing constraints that would result from such a mandate.

Assembly Health Committee Oppose Unless Amended Letter

Assembly Appropriations Committee Oppose Unless Amended Letter

AB 894 (Carrillo, D-Palmdale)

Neutral if Amended

Passed the Assembly Appropriations Committee on May 14. Pending an Assembly floor vote on the consent calendar.

AB 894 would require general acute care hospitals to inform patients of their right to opt out of the patient directory. Such hospitals would be required to verbally inform patients during the intake process, as well as update the “Acknowledgment of Privacy Rights” form to include a checkbox allowing patients to opt out. Forthcoming amendments will include a six-month delayed implementation date to give hospitals time to update their process and workflow to come into compliance. 

AB 960 (Garcia, D-Rancho Cucamonga)

Follow

Passed the Assembly Health Committee on April 22. May 21 hearing in the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

AB 960 would require general acute care hospitals to allow patients with physical, intellectual, developmental, or cognitive disabilities — including dementia — to have a family member or caregiver present as needed, including outside regular visiting hours, to ensure they can fully and equally access hospital services.

AB 1386 (Bains, D-Bakersfield)

Oppose Unless Amended

Placed on the Assembly Appropriations Committee suspense file on May 14.

AB 1386 would require perinatal services to be considered a basic service at general acute care hospitals, as well as establish a process for hospitals that do not provide this service to submit a compliance plan to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) for approval or denial. The plan must include information on the hospital’s transfer agreements, financial limitations, efforts to establish perinatal care, and other requirements as determined by CDPH. CHA has been actively engaged with the author on amendments so the bill takes a comprehensive approach — one that addresses the key drivers of maternity unit closures, including low delivery volume, workforce shortages, and financial challenges. 

Assembly Health Committee Oppose Unless Amended Letter

Assembly Appropriations Committee Oppose Unless Amended Letter

SB 81 (Arreguín, D-Oakland)

Support

May 23 hearing on the Senate Appropriations Committee suspense file.

SB 81 would prohibit health care providers, including health facilities defined under Health and Safety Code Section 1250, from granting immigration enforcement access to patients or nonpublic areas without a valid judicial warrant or court order. The bill would require health care providers to establish or update procedures, as well as inform staff and volunteers on how to respond to immigration enforcement requests. Additionally, it would expand the definition of “medical information” to include immigration status and place of birth, and it would define “immigration enforcement” to encompass efforts related to both civil and criminal federal immigration laws.

Senate Health Committee Support Letter

Senate Judiciary Committee Support Letter