CHA News

Assembly to Vote on Bill Clarifying Deadline for Anti-Harassment Training

For Chief Legal Counsel, COOs, Human Resources Executives, Government Relations Staff

This post has been archived and contains information that may be out of date.

Earlier this month, the Assembly Appropriations Committee passed Senate Bill (SB) 778 (Committee on Labor, Public Employment and Retirement), which would extend the deadline for providing sexual harassment prevention training to Dec. 31, 2020. The bill is now pending on the Assembly Floor and should be heard when the Legislature returns the week of Aug. 12.

SB 778 also would allow employers who have provided anti-harassment training to either supervisory or non-supervisory employees between Jan. 1, 2019, and Dec. 31, 2020, to maintain their existing biannual training schedule.

The bill addresses the significant confusion over the deadlines in SB 1343 (Chapter 956, Statutes of 2018), which requires employers with five or more employees to provide sexual harassment prevention training to non-supervisory staff — effective Jan. 1, 2020 — and every two years thereafter. SB 1343 included grandfather language for training conducted in 2019, but its application to existing supervisory training requirements was unclear. 

After SB 1343 took effect, the Department of Fair Employment and Housing issued frequently asked questions about the new law. According to the department, all training — both supervisory and non-supervisory — must be completed by Jan. 1, 2020, and only training conducted in 2019 would be considered compliant. Thus, if a hospital provided sexual harassment training to supervisors in 2018, the hospital would have to provide that training again in 2019, rather than in 2020 as previously required. The employer community did not believe this was the intent of SB 1343 and brought their concerns to the attention of the bill’s author, Sen. Mitchell (D-Los Angeles), as well as the Senate Labor Committee.

Both the senator and the committee agreed that it would be beneficial to clarify the deadlines; SB 778 would do so, and includes an urgency clause so that it would go into effect immediately if signed. The bill has received no opposition and is expected to pass the full Assembly. After that, it will be presented to the Governor for signing.